Jew Is Right?
Engaging with guest speakers
representing different approaches to Jewish life.
by Talia Raider-Roth, 11th grade, Cincinnati
front row seats for our speakers representing three streams of Jewish life. |
With the
promise of breakfast in the Zula, due to Israel's municipal election day, and Jewish
History class in the Belmont lecture hall, we all got up excited and interested
to see how class that day would go. As we all got seated in the Belmont, we
discussed our expectations for the day. Was the Haredi speaker going to be nice
or stony and serious? What would be the difference between him and the Conservative
movement speaker? Soon, David came up to the front and started to explain the
outline for the day: Rav Yehoshua Weinberger would be our Haredi speaker, Rabbi
Noa Satat would be our Reform movement speaker, and Rabbi Ari Chasid would be
our Conservative movement speaker. We were reminded that we would hear
viewpoints that are different from our own and that we should keep an open mind
as well as ask questions. Our school principal Rabbi Loren reminded us how
important it was to hear different views to gain a better understanding of the
Jewish political climate in Israel as well as an understanding of the
differences between the modern streams of Judaism. With that, Rabbi Loren
welcomed up Yehoshua Weinberger.
The
Haredi Community
Rav
Yehoshua Weinberger had a very long beard, and wore a long black coat and a
kippah. He tucked his payot behind his ears. He looked like a very serious man,
but from the minute he opened his mouth he had our groups attention. He cracked
many jokes and created a comfortable atmosphere in the room. He began to talk
about his childhood and parents. Born to two orthodox, Holocaust survivors,
religion has always been an integral part of Rav Weinberger’s life. When he
grew up he went to work in what was then the Soviet Union, and then made aliyah
to Israel in 1991. Moving to Israel allowed him to be a part of an even more
vibrant Hasidic community.
“I do not
like the term ultra-orthodox,” he explained “It has negative associations.”
“What about
‘super-duper’ orthodox?” asked my classmate Dani Pattiz, smiling.
“Sure, I
like that term.”
He
continued on by explaining what a regular day is like for him. He gets up at
5:15 in order to study Talmud at 5:45. During the day he teaches and lectures
at a yeshiva in Jerusalem with his wife, who he talked lovingly about throughout
his entire speech. He gets home around 4 or 5 pm in order to go to synagogue at
night to pray and study. He goes to sleep at 11 in order to get sleep for his
early morning the next day. On Shabbat, however, the day is tranquil and he
spends the day with his community, eating and singing.
He then
opened the floor to questions. We asked many difficult but important questions,
the first being “Who is God to you?”
He
responded that, to him, God is “whoever you want him to be. God introduced
himself at Sinai” and the books that he gave the Jewish people tells us how to
communicate with him. The Torah contains our instructions and we are obligated to
follow them. This was the response that I had expected, given what I know about
the Hasidic community. They believe that the Tanakh is “torah m’sinai”, it is
all to be taken literally, every word.
The next
question asked was about his view on the Palestinian conflict. The room got
noticeably tenser, as this is a touchy subject in which at least one person
will end up offended.
“It would be great to live side by side in peace,” he
responded. However, he continued, they [the Palestinians] have proven to be
untrustworthy. We tried to create a peace treaty and they did not wish to
comply. He remembers being scared on buses when the terror attacks of the
second Intifada were occurring, “it was living hell”. He thinks all the
different plans for resolving the conflict are total chaos because not everyone
recognizes every treaty and the Palestinians themselves are not ready to make
any compromises.
The next
question was a lighter, easier one. The question was how he met his wife. He
smiled and began to tell us the Hasidic customs for boys and girls. From the
beginning they go to separate schools and are not permitted to touch. They only
meet each other to see if marriage seems like an amicable arrangement between
the boy and the girl. Parents ask their children about their preferences for a
partner, and once two families have been connected, both sides ask questions
about the other. Rav Weinberger met his wife only four times before he knew,
that was who he wanted to marry. He believes that the system works, he is
extremely happy and loves his wife.
two of my classmates stayed during the break to continue the conversation |
The next
question was about what he considered the most important aspect of Judaism. He
smiled and responded that this was a very difficult and layered questions. To
him, of course, being Jewish is the most important to him. He continued that a
connection to God and the Jewish people is extremely important along with the
Torah and all of the Mitzvot.
Then came
the question that was a troublesome and upsetting question that was also asked
when we visited a mosque: what were his views on the LGBTQ+ community? He
responded that his personal opinion is irrelevant, Nobody knows if their
opinions are right or wrong so they are inconsequential. God has given an answer
to these questions and that is all that matters. Personally, he continued, he
believes that anyone should be able to do anything they want, a man and a man,
a mother and son, a human and an animal, they are all the same to him. However
God is the only one who can decide and God deemed all of these acts
unacceptable.
my classmate Annie is listening intently with one of our teachers Evan in the background |
With an
awkward break our group continued onto the next question: What happens if there
are problems in a marriage? He responded that, as in most communities, divorce
is regarded as a tragedy, especially if children are involved. The couple
should do everything in their power to save the marriage as both sides are
required to go to counseling before marriage. God says that divorce is allowed,
if all other measures have been taken to try to save the marriage.
The next
and last question was more personal to our group: What were his views on Reform
Judaism? He believed that Reform Judaism and Reform Jews are two separate
groups. Anyone born to a Jewish mother or converted by an orthodox rabbi is
Jewish. His issue is not with Reform Jews but with Reform Judaism, which he
sees as a completely separate religion. The Reform movement, he continued, is
not working, it is shrinking.
And with
that his portion of the morning was over. He was an interesting man who gave us
all many different glances into the Hasidic world and their views of the rest
of the world
The
Reform Community
Next we met Rabbi Noa Satat, a Reform rabbi who works at the
Israel Religious Action Center, much like the RAC in Washington. She was born
to a secular family who raised her with strong values based in social action.
This led her to work her way to become the head of the Jerusalem Open
House-LGBTQ+ Center. She also works to connect Jewish and Palestinian students
in order to better relations. The Jewish students, she explained, seemed scared
to answer questions from Palestinian students. She wants to change the Jewish-Palestinian
narrative and make the students more comfortable around each other because it
is our job to bring about equality for everyone. She continued to explain that
her work is not counterproductive to the Torah and its mitzvot because the
Torah is not historically accurate, it is made of of fictitious stories written
by four different editors. The stories in the Torah are meant to teach the
Jewish people lessons about how to act and how to create your own moral
compass; they contain deep truths. She believes that personal choice is very
important, as how we act determines our closeness to God. This is why the
Haskalah is also important, it reverses some of the mitzvot that are
troublesome (i.e. “man shall not sleep with man”). She expressed that opening
our arms to those in need and/or persecuted makes us more Jewish, not less.
Rabbi Noa Satat talked about her work with at the Israel Religious Action Center (IRAC) |
On the question
of Israel, she responded that she believes there are fundamental problems with
the government and that Israel should not be a religious state. This is because
the government uses it for its own personal agenda. Those who disagree with the
government are deemed as anti-zionists and anti-semites.
The other
question asked was about being a female rabbi: how has it affected her? She
responded that many people did not want her to perform any ceremonies because
she was a woman and Reform, two things which the orthodox community looks down
on. Although it is a struggle, it is important for her to represent the
community and to work towards creating an equal and free state.
The
Conservative Community
Our last
speaker was Rabbi Ari Chasid. He was born to a single mother who switched from an
Orthodox to a Conservative community. She found community in a Conservative
synagogue where she later married a Turkish man whom she raised her child with.
Judaism had always been an important aspect of his life and he remained
involved in the Jewish community as he grew up.
When asked
about the importance of Orthodox vs. Conservative vs. Reform, he responded that
“denominations are important to how we think but not how we define ourselves”.
As important as denominations are, that should not stop the Jewish community
from coexisting and thriving.
Rabbi Ari Chasid was informative discussing Conservative Judaism |
Another
question was raised about the Torah: was it given by God and were the stories
historically accurate? Yes, he responded, the Torah was given to us, whether
that be metaphorically or by another means, by God. However, the stories are
not all historically accurate. They are lessons that reveal truths to us. The
world changes all the time and so should the way we interpret the Torah.
Class Discussion
At the end
of the talks, we divided up into classes to discuss what we had heard. After
going outside, our class sat down in a circle. David asked us what we thought.
Some people found problems with Rav Weinberger’s explanation that what he
thought was irrelevant, while others found problems with what both Rabbi Satat
and Rabbi Chasid said. All in all, there was a consensus that the talks were
both important and educational. They taught us about the other Jewish
communities and the way that they live. We learned about how these communities
viewed the others and the separations between all of the communities.
we had a wrap-up discussion outside after hearing the 3 speakers |
I feel very
lucky to have had this opportunity. It troubles me that the communities have
little interaction and conversations between themselves. It was important to me
to hear from all of these speakers so that I could form my own, educated
opinions about the different connections I have to each denomination. It also
gave me an opportunity to learn more about my connection to Judaism and how to
deal with the modern topics that the torah addresses anachronistically.
teachers David Alon and Talia Jacobson enthusiastically leading the wrap-up discussion |
No comments:
Post a Comment